Emojier som parasproglige resurser i skrevet onlineinteraktion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/nys.v1i65.142956Nøgleord:
emojier, skriftlig onlineinteraktion, parasprog, mimik, gestikResumé
Denne artikel præsenterer en ny forståelse af emojier, nemlig som en kropsforankret semiotisk resurse. Med afsæt i at se interaktion som en kropsligt funderet udfoldelse og med udgangspunkt i tidligere forskning i ’nyskriftlige’ resurser der fungerer som kompensation for det manglende kropssprog, undersøger artiklen hvordan primært emojier kan forstås som erstatning for de parasproglige virkemidler der er fraværende i skriftlig interaktion, dvs. kropsbevægelser, ansigtsudtryk og stemmemæssige forhold. Artiklen giver både et indblik i hvordan emojier virker som præfabrikeret teknologi og system, og et overblik over tidligere forskning i emojiers pragmatiske funktion før den via Peirces tre tegntyper, ikon, symbol og indeks, viser hvordan den fysiske krops sprog manifesterer sig i digitale kropsemojier. Med udgangspunkt i forskning i ansigtsudtryk og tidligere analyser af digital gestik undersøges det hvordan deltagere i forskellige online interaktionssituationer bruger det digitale kropssprog. Der argumenteres for at emojier netop egner sig godt til at formidle følelser og til at guide modtageren i at forstå afsenderens hensigt med det skrevne fordi brugen af emojier og forståelsen af dem er kropsligt funderet. Deltagerne i skrevet onlineinteraktion bruger emojier som kompensation for den parasproglige information fordi emojierne i vid udstrækning ligner og føles som kropslig kommunikation.
Referencer
Amin, H. 2022. Emojis and the neoliberal coding of diversity: A monocultural multiculturalism. on_culture (online) 14. 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22029/oc.2022.1302.
An, J., T. Li, Y. Teng & P. Zhang. 2018. Factors influencing emoji usage in smartphone mediated communications. G. Chowdhury, J. McLeod, V. Gillet & P. Willett (red.), Transforming digital worlds. iConference 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol 10766. 423-428. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_46.
Androutsopoulos, J. 2011. Language change and digital medie: A review of conceptions and evidence. T. Kristiansen & N. Coupland (red.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe. 145-159. Oslo: Novus. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110472226-033.
Androutsopoulos, J.K. 2018. Digitale Interpunktion: Stilistische Ressourcen und soziolinguistischer Wandel in der informellen digitalen Schriftlichkeit von Jugendlichen. A. Ziegler (red.), Jugendsprachen/Youth languages: Aktuelle Perspektiven internationaler Forschung/Current perspectives of international research, 722-748. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Austin, J.L. 1982. How to do things with words: the William James lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. 2. udg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bai, Q., D. Qi, M. Zhe & Y. Maokun. 2019. A systematic review of emoji: Current research and future perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02221.
Barbieri, F., K. German, R. Francesco & S. Horacio. 2016. How cosmopolitan are emojis?: Exploring emojis usage and meaning over different languages with distributional semantics. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Multimedia Conference, 531-533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2964284.2967278.
Berthelsen, U.D., T.T. Hougaard & M.V. Christensen. 2019. Medialekter i et grammatisk og didaktisk perspektiv. Y. Goldshtein, I.S. Hansen & T.T. Hougaard (red.), 17. Møde om Udforskningen af Dansk Sprog 17, 95-111. Aarhus Universitet.
Bolter, J.D. & R. Grusin. 1999. Remediation: understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij.1999.4.4.208.1.
Bolter, J.D. 1991. Writing space: the computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Cherny, L. 1999. Conversation and community. Chat in a virtual world. Lealand Stanford Junior University: CSLI Publications.
Cohn, N., J. Engelen & J. Schilperoord. 2019. The grammar of emoji? Constraints on communicative pictorial sequencing. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 4(1). 2-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0177-0.
Cramer, H., P.d. Juan & J. Tetreault. 2016. Sender-intended functions of emojis in US messaging. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 504-509. New York: ACM. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2935334.2935370.
Crystal, D. 2006. Language and the Internet. 2. udg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Daft, R.L. & R.H. Lengel. 1984. Information richness: a new approach to managerial behavior & organizational design. L.L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (red.), Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 6, 191-233. Homewood, IL: JAI Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA128980.
Dainas, A. & S.C. Herring. 2021. Interpreting emoji pragmatics. C. Xie, F. Yus & H. Haberland (red.), Approaches to internet pragmatics: Theory and practice, 107- 144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318.04dai.
Danesi, M. 2017. The semiotics of emoji, Bloomsbury advances in semiotics. London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474282024.
Danet, B. 1998. Text as mask: Gender, play, and performance on the Internet. S.G. Jones (red.), Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community, 129-158. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243689.n5.
Dresner, E. & S.C. Herring. 2010. Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication theory 20(3). 249-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01362.x.
Dresner, E. & S.C. Herring. 2013. Emoticons and illocutionary force. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7131-4_8.
Due, B.L. 2016. Fælles orientering som ressource for idéudvikling: En single case-analyse baseret på Distributed Cognition (DC) & Conversation Analysis (CA). NyS, Nydanske sprogstudier 1(50). 86-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/nys.v1i50.23799.
Duncker, D. 2019. The reflexivity of language and linguistic inquiry: Integrational linguistics in practice. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351060394.
Dürscheid, C. & C.M. Siever. 2017. Jenseits des Alphabets – Kommunikation mit Emojis. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 45(2). 256-285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2017-0013.
Ekman, P. & W.V. Friesen. 1969. The repertoire of nonverbal behavioral categories. Semiotica 1. 49-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49.
Ekman, P. & W.V. Friesen. 1975. Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs.
Evans, V. 2017. The emoji code: the linguistics behind smiley faces and scaredy cats. New York: Picador.
Garcia, A.C. & J.B. Jacobs. 1999. The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-cynchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction 32(4). 337-367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973rls3204_2.
Gawne, L. & G. McCulloch. 2019. Emoji as digital gestures. Language@Internet 17(2).
Gerlitz, C. & A. Helmond. 2013. The like economy. New Media and Society 15(8). 1348-1365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812472322.
Giles, D., W. Stommel & T.M. Paulus. 2017. The microanalysis of online data: The next stage. Journal of Pragmatics 115. 37-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.02.007.
Gumperz, J.J. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834.
Hansen, M.H. & A.C. Stæhr. 2021. Sproglige generationsforskelle på de sociale medier. NyS, Nydanske Sprogstudier 1(59). 113-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/nys.v1i59.121811.
Herring, S.C. & J. Ge-Stadnyk. 2023. Emoji and illocutionarity: Acting On, and acting as, language. M. Gill, A. Malmivirta & B. Warvik (red.), Structures in discourse: Studies in interaction, adaptability, and pragmatic functions, 123-154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Herring, S.C. & A.R. Dainas. 2020. Gender and age influences on interpretation of emoji functions. ACM Transactions on Social Computing 10 (Special Issue on Emoji Understanding and Applications in Social Media). 1-26. doi: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3375629.
Herring, S.C. & A.R. Dainas. 2017. ”Nice picture comment!” Graphicons in Facebook comment threads. Proceedings of the Fiftieth Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2017.264.
Herring, S.C., D. Stein & T. Virtanen. 2013. Introduction to the pragmatics of computer- mediated communication. S.C. Herring, D. Stein & T. Virtanen (red.), Handbook of pragmatics of computer-mediated communication, 3-31. Berlin: Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468.
Hjarvard, S. 2007. Sprogets medialisering. Språk i Norden. 29-45.
Hougaard, T.T. 2004. Nærmest en leg. En undersøgelse af sprog og interaktion i dansk webchat. Ph.d.-afhandling. Aarhus Universitet.
Hougaard, T.T. 2014. Sproglige forandringer i de nye medier : fra chatstil til hashtagpoesi. NyS, Nydanske Sprogstudier 46. 39-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/nys.v46i46.17524.
Hougaard, T.T. 2020. Emojis. Tænkepauser (84). Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv34wmr49.
Hougaard, T.T. & L.B.C. Lund. 2019. Medialektale træk i digitale dialoger. Språk i Norden 49(1). 7-23.
Hougaard, T.T. & M. Rathje. 2018. Emojis in the digital writings of young Danes. A. Ziegler (red.), Jugendsprachen/Youth Languages. Aktuelle Perspektiven internationaler Forschung/Current Perspectives of International Research, 773-806. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110472226-035.
Jaeger, S.R. & G. Ares. 2017. Dominant meanings of facial emoji: Insights from Chinese consumers and comparison with meanings from internet resources. Food Quality and Preference 62. 275-283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.04.009.
Jakobson, R. 1960. Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. T.A. Sebeok, Style in language, 350-377. New York og London: The Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Tecnology og John Wiley & Sons.
Jensen, T.W. 2009. Følelser og sprog - den verbale manifestation af følelser i sproglig interaktion. NyS, Nydanske Sprogstudier 37. 34-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/nys.v37i37.13502.
Junge, T.A. 2019. Hører du overhovedet efter? En undersøgelse af talerens mimik i en situation med manglende respons. NyS, Nydanske Sprogstudier 56. 133-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/nys.v1i56.111288.
Jørgensen, M. 2018. Samtalegrammatik i skriftlig online interaktion: En analyse af de tre kommentarindledende partikler altså, øhm og hm i to danske Facebookgrupper. Skandinaviske sprogstudier 9(1). 24-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/sss.v9i1.109462.
Kelly, R. & L. Watts. 2015. Characterising the inventive appropriation of emoji as relationally meaningful in mediated close personal relationships. Experiences of technology appropriation: Unanticipated users, usage, circumstances, and design. University of Bath.
Kendon, A. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kendon, A. 2017. Reflections of the ”gesture-first” hypothesis of language origins. Psychon Bull Rev 24. 163-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572.
Koh, J., J. Cherian, P. Taele & T. Hammond. 2019. Developing a hand gesture recognition system for mapping symbolic hand gestures to analogous emojis in computer-mediated communication. ACM transactions on interactive intelligent systems 9(1). 1-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3297277.
Lebduska, L. 2014. Emoji, emoji, what for art thou? Harlot 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15760/harlot.2014.12.6.
Lévy, P. 1998. Becoming virtual: reality in the digital age. New York: Plenum.
Malinowski, B. 1923. The problem of meaning in primitive languages. C.K. Ogden & I.A. Richards (red.), The meaning of meaning, 451-510. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Martin, J. R. & M. Zappavigna. 2019. Embodied meaning: a systemic functional perspective on paralanguage. Functional linguistics 6(1): 1-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-018-0065-9.
McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and mind - What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McNeill, D. 2006. Gesture: A psycholinguistic approach. R.E. Asher & J.M.Y Simpson (red.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 58-66. DOI: https://doi.org//10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00798-7.
Meredith, J. & J. Potter. 2013. Conversation analysis and electronic interactions: Methodological, analytic and technical considerations, H. Lim & F. Sudweeks (red.), Innovative methods and technologies for electronic discourse analysis, 370- 393. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Miller, H., D. Kluver, L. Thebault-Spieker, L. Terveen & B. Hecht. 2017. Understanding emoji ambiguity in context: The role of text in emoji-related miscommunication. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 152-161 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14901.
Miller, H., J. Thebault-Spieker, S. Chang, I. Johnson, L. Terveen & B. Hecht. 2016. ”Blissfully happy” or ”ready to fight”: Varying interpretations of emoji, 259-268. International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
Moschini, I. 2016. The ”face with tears of joy” emoji. A socio-semiotic and multimodal insight into a Japan-America mash-up. HERMES-Journal of Language and Communication in Business 55. 11-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v0i55.24286.
Murr, L.E. & J.B. Williams. 1988. Half-brained ideas about education: Thinking and learning with both the left and right brain in a visual culture. Leonardo 21(4). 413-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1578704.
Na’aman, N., H. Provenza & O. Montoya. 2017. MojiSem: Varying linguistic purposes of emoji in (Twitter) context. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics- Student Research Workshop. 136- 141. Vancouver: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-3022.
Nielsen, M.F. & S.B. Nielsen. 2010. Samtaleanalyse. Fredriksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
Novak, P.K., J. Smailović, B. Sluban & I. Mozetič. 2015. Sentiment of emojis. PLoS One1 10(12). 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144296.
Ozanne, M., A.C. Navas, A.S. Mattila & H.B. Van Hoof. 2017. An investigation into Facebook ”liking” behavior - an exploratory study. Social Media + Society 3(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117706785.
Pavalanathan, U. & J. Eisenstein. 2016. Emoticons vs. emojis on Twitter: A causal inference Approach. ArXiv abs/1510.08480.
Peirce, C.S. 1995. Semiotik og pragmatisme. Moderne tænkere. København: Samlerens Bogklub.
Pohl, H., C. Domin & M. Rohs. 2017. Beyond just text: Semantic emoji similarity modeling to support expressive communication. ACM transactions on computer- human interaction 24(1). 1-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3039685.
Provine, R.R., R.J. Spencer & D.L. Mandell. 2007. Emotional expression online: Emoticons punctuate website text messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 26(3). 299-307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X06303481.
Quinta, N. da , E.S. Cruz, Y. Rios, B. Alfaro & I.M.d. Marañón. 2023. What is behind a facial emoji? The effects of context, age, and gender on children’s understanding of emoji. Food Quality and Preference 105(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104761.
Ravelli, L.J. & T.V. Leeuwen. 2018. Modality in the digital age. Visual communication. 17(3). 277-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218764436.
Riordan, M.A. 2017. Emojis as tools for emotion work: Communicating affect in text messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 36(5). 549-567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17704238.
Rodrigues, D., D. Lopes, M. Prada, D. Thompson & M.V. Garrido. 2017. A frown emoji can be worth a thousand words: Perceptions of emoji use in text messages exchanged between romantic partners. Telematics and Informatics 34(8). 1532- 1543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.001.
Salló, S. 2011. The faces of messenger emoticons in the virtual communication. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae. Social Analysis 1(2). 307-332.
Schandorf, M. 2012. Mediated gesture: Paralinguistic communication and phatic text. Convergence: The international Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 19(3). 319-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856512439501.
Schegloff, E.A. 1982. Discourse as an interactional achievement: some uses of ’uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. D. Tannen (red.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk, 71-93. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
Schegloff, E.A. 1996. Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction. E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff & S.A. Thompson (red.), Interaction and grammar, 52-133. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002.
Scott Sørensen, A. & B.K. Walther. 2001. Cyberflux: digital kunst og kommunikation, Cyberflux; 1. Odense: Odense Universitetsforlag.
Skovholt, K., A. Grønning & A. Kankaanranta. 2014. The communicative functions of emoticons in workplace e-mails: :-). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19. 780-797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12063.
Sproull, L. & S. Kiesler. 1986. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communications. Management Science 32(11). 1492-1512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492.
Stage, C. & T.T. Hougaard. 2018. The language of illness and death on social media. An affective approach. D.R. Christensen & K. Sandvik (red.), Sharing death online, Vol. 1. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.
Stark, L. & K. Crawford. 2015. The conservatism of emoji: Work, affect, and communication. Social Media + Society 1(2). 87-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604853.
Steensig, J. 2001. Sprog i virkeligheden: bidrag til en interaktionel lingvistik. Århus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Stivers, T. 2008. Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on language and social interaction 41(1). 31-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123.
Sundén, J. 2003. Material virtualities. New York: Peter Lang.
Togeby, O. 2019. Om tegn analogi, konvention, situationalitet. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv34wmv9b.
Turkle, S. 1997. Life on the screen: identity in the age of the internet. New York: Touchstone.
Watzlawick, P., J.B. Bavelas & D.D. Jackson. 1967. Pragmatics of human communication: a study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: W. W. Norton.
Werry, C.C. 1996. Linguistic and interactional features of Internet Relay Chat. S.C. Herring (red.), Computer-mediated communication. Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives, 47-63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.39.06wer.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Forfatteren/forfatterne og NyS har ophavsret til de artikler og anmeldelser der bringes i tidsskriftet. NyS har ophavsretten til den udgivne version af tidsskriftet. Forfatteren har ophavsretten til sin egen tekst. Forfattere kan arkivere den publicerede artikel på deres institutions forskningsarkiv (Institutional Repository) eller en privat hjemmeside, når forfatteren samtidig linker til artiklen med den officielle DOI.
For artikler publiceret i NyS tillades at læsere kan downloade, kopiere, udskrive, søge eller linke til og citere fra artikler til ethvert lovligt formål. Artikler kan frit deles og linkes til på forsknings- og undervisningsnetværk (så som Blackboard, Moodle, Canvas o.a.). Link foretrækkes fordi det giver oplysning om brug af tidsskriftets artikler, og fordi det anerkender tidsskriftets redaktionelle arbejde. NyS tillader ikke at læsere bruger artikler eller dele af dem i egne artikler uden at citere, eller at læsere på anden vis anvender dem til kommercielle formål.
