”Hvad må vi så gøre?”: Repetitive spørgsmål og adfærdsregulerende responser i interaktion med en person med demens
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/nys.v1i54.98689Nøgleord:
demens, atypisk interaktion, konversationsanalyse, gentagende adfærd, adaption, adfærdsregulerende responserResumé
Denne artikel præsenterer et studie af en type af gentagende adfærd, nemlig forskellige varianter af spørgsmålet: ”Hvad må vi så gøre?”. Spørgsmålet stilles af den samme demente borger gentagne gange i løbet af en eftermiddag i fællesrummet på et plejehjem i samspil med plejepersonale og besøgende. Studiet baseres på data i form af feltnoter samt videooptagelser af interaktioner der foregår i et fællesrum på et demensafsnit på et dansk plejehjem over en periode på i alt 9 måneder. Vi bruger etnometodologisk konversationsanalyse (EMCA) til at undersøge hvordan borgeren selv forsøger at løse sproglige, kognitive og sociale udfordringer ved at tage initiativ til handling med denne spørgsmålstype, og hvordan dette initiativ bliver responderet på af plejepersonale og besøgende. Derigennem peger vi på hvordan gentagende adfærd ikke nødvendigvis blot skal ses som et sygdomstegn der måtte kalde på såkaldte adfærdsregulerende responser fra omgivelserne, men som borgerens brug af sine tilbageværende ressourcer til at udføre forskelligartede handlinger i disse kontekster.
Referencer
Algase, D. m.fl. 1996. Need-driven dementia-compromised behavior: An alternative view of disruptive behavior. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias 11(6). 10-19. DOI: 10.1177/153331759601100603
Andersen, E.M. & J. Isaksen. 2017. Achieving a common understanding of a person with aphasia’s self-assessments of progress in speech and communication. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 8(1). 1-26. DOI: 10.1558/jircd.31342
Antaki, C. 2011. Applied Conversation Analysis: intervention and change in institutional talk. Palgrave Macmillan.
Antaki, C. & R. Wilkinson. 2012. Conversation analysis and the study of atypical populations. J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (red.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 533-550. Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781118325001.ch26.
Ayass, R. 2014. Using media as involvement shields. Journal of Pragmatics 72. 5-17.
Bryden (Boden), C. 2002. A person-centred approach to counselling, psychotherapy and rehabilitation of people with dementia in the early stages. Dementia 1(2). 141-156.
Casby, J.A. & M.B. Holm. 1994. The effect of music on Repetitive Disruptive Vocalizations of Persons with Dementia. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 48(10).
Chatwin, J. 2014. Conversation analysis as a method for investigating interaction in care home environments. Dementia 13(6). 737-746. DOI: 10.1177/1471301213485231
Corsaro, W.A. 1977. The Clarification Request as a Feature of Adult Interactive Styles with Young Children. Language & Society 6(2). 183-207.
Cullen, B. m.fl. 2005. Repetitive behavior in Alzheimer’s disease: description, correlates and functions. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 20. 686-693.
Drew, P. & J. Heritage (red.), 1992. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fitzgerald, R. & Housley, W. (red.) 2015. Advances in membership categorization Analysis. Sage.
Goffman, E. 1963. Behavior in Public Places. Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York:
The Free Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Goodwin, C. 1980. Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of a State of Mutual Gaze at Turn Beginning. Sociological inquiry 50(3-4). 272-302.
Goodwin, C. 1984. Notes on the story structure and the organization of participation. J.M. Atkinson & J.
Heritage (red.), Structures of Social Action, 225-246. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, C. 2007. Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society,
18(1), 53-73. DOI: 10.1177/0957926507069457.
Have, P. ten 2002. The Notion of Member is the Heart of the Matter: On the Role of Membership Knowledge in Ethnomethodological Inquiry. Forum: Qualitative Social research 3(3).
Have, P. ten. 2009. Conversation analysis: analysing everyday conversational activities. M. Hviid
Jacobsen (red.), Encountering the everyday: an introduction to the sociologies of the unnoticed. Houndmills
Basingstoke, Hampshire, U.K. & New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 257-278.
Hazel, S., K. Mortensen & G. Rasmussen. 2014. Introduction: A body of resources - CA studies of social
conduct. Journal of Pragmatics 65. 1-9.
Heinemann, T. 2006. ‘"Will you or can't you?" Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests’. Journal of Pragmatics 38. 1081-1104.
Hepburn, A. & G.B. Bolden. 2012. The conversation analytic approach to transcription. J. Sidnell &
T. Stivers (red.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 57-76. Wiley-Blackwell.
Heritage, J. 1984. A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. J.M. Atkinson & J.
Heritage (red.), Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hjalmarsson Österholm, J. & C. Samuelsson. 2015. Orally positioning persons with dementia in assessment
meetings. Ageing & Society 35: 2. 367-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X13000755
Holt, E. 1996. Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29(3). 219-245. DOI: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2.
Hutchby, I. & R. Wooffitt 2008. Conversation analysis (2. udgave). Polity Press.
Hwang, J.P. m.fl. 2000. Repetitive phenomena in dementia. The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine 30(2). 165–171. DOI: 10.2190/2QDA-YAL3-2E69-PYJW.
Hydén, L.-C. m.fl. 2012. Feedback and common ground in conversational storytelling involving people with Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 4(2). 211-247.
Jefferson, G. 1984. Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. V.D’Urso, P. Leonardi (red.), Discourse
analysis and natural rhetoric. Padua: Cleup Editore. 11-38
Jefferson, G. 1988. Notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maximum’ silence of
approximately one second conversation. D. Roger & P. Bull (red.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary
perspective. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Jefferson, G. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. G. H. Lerner (red.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation, 13-31. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kitwood, T. 1997. Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Koehn, S.D., J.F. Kozak & E. Drance. 2011. ‘The problem with Leonard’: A critical constructionist view of need-driven dementia-compromised behaviours. Dementia 11(6). 725-741. DOI: 10.1177/1471301211421264.
Lai, C.K.Y. & D.G. Arhur. 2003. Wandering behaviour in people with dementia. Journal of advanced nursing 44(2). 173-182. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02781.x
Lindholm, C. 2015. Parallel Realities: The Interactional Management of Confabulation in Dementia Care Encounters, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2). 176-199. DOI: 10.1080/08351813.2015.1025502
Lindholm, C. 2016. Boundaries of participation in care home settings: Use of the Swedish token jaså by a person with dementia. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 30(10). 832-848. DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2016.1208275.
Lubinski, R. m.fl. (red.), 1995. Dementia and Communication. San Diego, Singular Publishing Group.
Mace, N.L. & P.V. Rabins. 2017. The 36-hour day. A Family Guide to Caring for People Who Have Alzheimer Disease, Related Dementias, and Memory Loss. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Majlesi, A.R. & A. Ekström. 2016. Baking together—the coordination of actions in activities involving people with dementia. Journal of Aging Studies 38. 37-46.
Maynard, D.W. & Clayman, S.E. 1991. The Diversity og Ethnomethodology. Annual Review of Sociology 17. 385-418.
Mikesell, L. 2010. Repetitional responses in frontotemporal dementia discourse: Asserting agency or demonstrating confusion? Discourse Studies 12(4): 465-500. DOI: 10.1177/1461445610370127.
Mok, Z. & N. Müller. 2014. Staging casual conversations for people with dementia. Dementia 13(6). 834–853
Mondada, L. 2014. The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of
Pragmatics 65. 137–156.
Perkins, L., A. Whitworth & L. Lesser. 1998. ‘Conversing in dementia: a conversation analytic approach’, Journal of Neurolinguistics 11. 33-53. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0911604498000049.
Pilesjö, M. & G. Rasmussen 2011. Exploring interaction between a non-speaking boy using aided Augmentative and Alternative Communication and his everyday communication partners: Features of turn organization and turn design. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 2. 183-213.
Plejert. C. m.fl. 2015. ‘There’s a letter called ef’ on Challenges and Repair in Interpreter-Mediated Tests of Cognitive Functioning in Dementia Evaluations: A Case Study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 30(2). 163-187.
Pollner, M. & D. Goode. 1990. Ethnomethodology and person-centered practices. Person Centered Review 5. 203-220.
Pomerantz, A. 1984. Pursuing a response. J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (red.), Structures of social action, 152–163. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Pomerantz, A. & J. Heritage. 2012. Preference. J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (red.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 210-228. Wiley-Blackwell.
Rasmussen, G. 2013. That's My Story!: Resisting disabling processes in a therapeutic activity. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 4(2). 273-298. DOI: 10.1558/jircd.v4i2.273
Rasmussen, G. 2016. Repeated use of request for confirmation in atypical interaction. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 30(10). 849-870. DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2016.1209244.
Rasmussen G. 2017. The use of pictures for interactional purposes and the grammar of social interaction. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 8(1). 121-145. DOI: 10.1558/jircd.30282.
Rasmussen, G. (2018). On the Social Constraints of Having a World. RASK 46. 79-107.
Ridder, H.-M.O. m.fl. 2015. Notat til Sundheds- og Ældreudvalget, Christiansborg: Musikterapi som en integreret del af det danske sundhedsvæsen mhp. forebyggelse og behandling af psykiske lidelser, særligt ved demens.
Sacks, H. 1992. Lectures on conversation. 2 bind, redigeret af G. Jefferson med introduktion af E.A. Schegloff. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
Sacks, H., E.A. Schegloff & G. Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language 50. 696-735.
Schegloff, E.A. 2004. Whistling in the dark. Notes from the other side of liminality. Texas Linguistic Forum 48: 17-30. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual symposium about Language and Society – Austin.
Scheuer, J. 2012. Accountability som gearing af sproget. Nydanske Sprogstudier 43. 72-100.
Sidnell, J. & T. Stivers (red.), 2012. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell.
Smith, M. & K. Buchwalter. 2005. Behaviors associated with dementia. American Journal of Nursing 105 (7). 40-52.
Socialministeriet og Indenrigs- og Sundhedsministeriet. 2010. National Handlingsplan for Demensindsatsen. Silkeborg Bogtryk.
Steensig. J. 2001. Sprog i virkeligheden. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Sundheds- og ældreministeriet. 2016, 15. december. Ministre: Demenshandlingsplan har fokus på værdighed og faglighed. Sum.dk. (Tilgået 13. juli 2017 på http://www.sum.dk/Aktuelt/Nyheder/Aeldre/2016/December/Ministre-Demenshandlingsplan-har-fokus-paa-vaerdighed-og-faglighed.aspx).
Wilkinson, R. 1999. Conversation Analysis and Aphasia: Introduction. Aphasiology 13(4-5). 251-258.
Wilkinson, R. 2015. Conversation and aphasia: advances in analysis and intervention. Aphasiology 29(3). 257-268. DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2014.974138.
www.omtv2.tv2.dk/nyhedsartikler/nyhedsvisning/husk-livet-ugens-demensprogrammer/ (Tilgået 13. juli 2017).
www.sst.dk/da/aeldre/demens/viden-og-metoder/tema-om-kommunikation/ (Tilgået 15. februar 2018).
www.videnscenterfordemens.dk/forskning/nvds-forskning/behandling-og-intervention/ (Tilgået 5. marts 2018).
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Forfatteren/forfatterne og NyS har ophavsret til de artikler og anmeldelser der bringes i tidsskriftet. NyS har ophavsretten til den udgivne version af tidsskriftet. Forfatteren har ophavsretten til sin egen tekst. Forfattere kan arkivere den publicerede artikel på deres institutions forskningsarkiv (Institutional Repository) eller en privat hjemmeside, når forfatteren samtidig linker til artiklen med den officielle DOI.
For artikler publiceret i NyS tillades at læsere kan downloade, kopiere, udskrive, søge eller linke til og citere fra artikler til ethvert lovligt formål. Artikler kan frit deles og linkes til på forsknings- og undervisningsnetværk (så som Blackboard, Moodle, Canvas o.a.). Link foretrækkes fordi det giver oplysning om brug af tidsskriftets artikler, og fordi det anerkender tidsskriftets redaktionelle arbejde. NyS tillader ikke at læsere bruger artikler eller dele af dem i egne artikler uden at citere, eller at læsere på anden vis anvender dem til kommercielle formål.
