”Since I am Danish …”: National identitet brugt til at skabe tilknytning til fænomenet ’hygge’ i vlogs på YouTube
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/nys.v1i61.132243Nøgleord:
membership categorization analysis, identitetskonstruktion, dansk nationalitet, vlogs, hyggeResumé
.
Referencer
Adami, E. 2014. “Why did dinosaurs evolve from water?”: (in)coherent relatedness in YouTube video interaction. Text & Talk 34(3). 239-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0001.
Andersen, E.M. 2018. Konversationsanalyse - Sygdom på nettet. A.C. Stæhr & K.K. Mortensen (red.), Sociale medier og sprog: Analytiske tilgange, 145-82. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
Andersen, E.M. 2021. The radio host cried, the Facebook users identified: Crying as an action linked to ‘good people’. J. Meredith, D. Giles & W. Stommel (red.), Analysing digital interaction, 87-109. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64922-7.
Andersen, E.M. & M. Rathje. 2019. Age and stage of life categorizations used to moralize in online social conflict. Discourse, Context & Media 28. 19-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2019.02.001.
Antaki, C. & S. Widdicombe (red.). 1998. Identities in talk. Trowbridge: Sage Publications.
Benson, P. 2015. Commenting to learn: Evidence of language and intercultural learning in comments on YouTube videos. Language Learning & Technology 19(3). 88-105.
Bou-Franch, P., N. Lorenzo-Dus & P.G.-C. Blitvich. 2012. Social interaction in YouTube text-based polylogues: A study of coherence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17(4). 501-521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01579.x.
Breunig, M. & S. Kallestrup. 2020. Translating Hygge: A Danish design myth and its anglophone appropriation. Journal of Design History 33(2). 158-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/epz056.
Clifton, J. 2009. A membership categorization analysis of the Waco Siege: Perpetrator-victim identity as a moral discrepancy device for ‘doing’subversion. Sociological Research Online 14(5). 38-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2002.
Deppermann, A. 2013. How to get a grip on identities-in-interaction: (What) does ‘positioning’ offer more than ‘membership categorization’? Evidence from a mock story. Narrative Inquiry 23(1). 62-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.23.1.04dep.
Dynel, M. 2014. Participation framework underlying YouTube interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 73. 37-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.001.
Eglin, P. & S. Hester. 2006. The Montreal massacre: A story of membership categorization analysis. Wateroo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Fitzgerald, R. & W. Housley. 2002. Identity, categorization and sequential organization: The sequential and categorial flow of identity in a radio phone-in. Discourse & Society 13(5). 579-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013005275.
Fitzgerald, R. & W. Housley (red.). 2015. Advances in membership categorisation analysis. New Delhi: Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473917873.
Frobenius, M. 2014. Audience design in monologues: How vloggers involve their viewers. Journal of Pragmatics 72. 59-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.008.
Goffman, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday, Garden City.
Hester, S. & R. Fitzgerald. 1999. Category, predicate and contrast: some organisational features in a radio talk show. P.L. Jalbert (red.), Media Studies, 171-193. Lanham, USA: University Press of America.
Hougaard, T.T. 2015. Bidrag til en karakteristik af identitetskonstruktion på nettet - fra virtuel til medialiseret identitet. Skandinaviske Sprogstudier 6(3). 107-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/sss.v6i3.20650.
Housley, W. & R.J. Smith. 2011. Mundane reason, membership categorization practices and the everyday ontology of space and place in interview talk. Qualitative research 11(6). 698-715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111415960.
Jefferson, G. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 125. 13-34. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
Jenkins, R. 2008. Social identity. New York: Routledge.
Klastrup, L. 2016. Sociale netværksmedier. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
Leudar, I., V. Marsland & J. Nekvapil. 2004. On membership categorization: ‘us’, ‘them’ and ‘doing violence’ in political discourse. Discourse & Society 15(2-3). 243-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504041019.
Levisen, C. 2012. Cultural semantics and social cognition: A case study on the Danish universe of meaning. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110294651.
Marwick, A.E. & D. Boyd. 2011. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society 13(1). 114- 133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313.
Meyrowitz, J. 1985. No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. New York: Oxford University Press. Mogoș, A. & C. Trofin 2015. YouTube video genres. Amateur how-to videos versus professional tutorials. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Communicatio 9(2). 38-48.
Morrow, P.R. 2006. Telling about problems and giving advice in an Internet discussion forum: Some discourse features. Discourse Studies 8(4). 531-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606061876.
Pihlaja, S. 2014. “Christians” and “bad Christians”: categorization in atheist user talk on YouTube. Text & Talk 34(5). 623-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0020.
Psathas, G. 1999. Studying the organization in action: Membership categorization and interaction analysis. Human Studies 22(2). 139-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005422932589.
Raudaskoski, P. 2011. When lives meet live: Categorization work in a reality TV show and “experience work” in two home audiences. Text & Talk 31(5). 619- 41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2011.030.
Raun, T. 2018. Capitalizing intimacy: New subcultural forms of micro-celebrity strategies and affective labour on YouTube. Convergence 24(1). 99-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517736983.
Rautajoki, H. 2012. Membership categorization as a tool for moral casting in TV discussion: The dramaturgical consequentiality of guest introductions. Discourse Studies 14(2). 243-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611433637.
Sacks, H. 1972. On the analyzability of stories by children. D. Hymes & J.J. Gumperz (red.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication, 325-45. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Sacks, H. 1974. On the analysability of Stories by Children. R. Turner (red.), Ethnomethodology; selected readings, 216-32. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Sacks, H. 1989. Lecture six: The MIR membership categorization device. Human Studies 12. 271-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142771.
Schegloff, E.A. 2007. A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics 39(3). 462-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007.
Shrikant, N. 2018. “There’s no such thing as Asian”: A membership categorization analysis of cross-cultural adaptation in an Asian American business community. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 11(4). 286-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404520000846.
Simonsen, T.M. 2013. Selvpræsentationer på YouTube-vloggen som troværdig performance. O.E. Hansen & L. Højbjerg (red.), Online videoer-på sociale medieplatforme, 67-94. Aarhus: Systime Academic.
Sirola, A., M. Kaakinen, T. Turja & A. Oksanen. 2019. (Un)doing deviance: Social categorization in user reactions to pro-anorexia videos on YouTube. M.F. Wright (red.), Digital technology: Advances in research and applications, 231-60. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Staksrud, E. m.fl. 2019. A guide to Internet research ethics. The Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees. https://www.forskningsetikk.no/globalassets/dokumenter/4-publikasjoner-som-pdf/a-guide-to-internet-research-ethics.pdf (tilgået 14. februar 2022).
Stokoe, E. 2010. Gender, conversation analysis, and the anatomy of membership categorization practices. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4(7). 428-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00261.x.
Stokoe, E. 2012. Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies 14(3). 277-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00261.x.
Stommel, W. & T. Koole 2010. The online support group as a community: A micro-analysis of the interaction with a new member. Discourse Studies 12(3). 357-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00261.x.
Wiking, M. 2016. The little book of hygge: Danish secrets to happy living. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
Zimmerman, D.H. 1998. Identity, context and interaction. C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (red.), Identities in talk, 87-106. Trowbridge: Sage Publications.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Forfatteren/forfatterne og NyS har ophavsret til de artikler og anmeldelser der bringes i tidsskriftet. NyS har ophavsretten til den udgivne version af tidsskriftet. Forfatteren har ophavsretten til sin egen tekst. Forfattere kan arkivere den publicerede artikel på deres institutions forskningsarkiv (Institutional Repository) eller en privat hjemmeside, når forfatteren samtidig linker til artiklen med den officielle DOI.
For artikler publiceret i NyS tillades at læsere kan downloade, kopiere, udskrive, søge eller linke til og citere fra artikler til ethvert lovligt formål. Artikler kan frit deles og linkes til på forsknings- og undervisningsnetværk (så som Blackboard, Moodle, Canvas o.a.). Link foretrækkes fordi det giver oplysning om brug af tidsskriftets artikler, og fordi det anerkender tidsskriftets redaktionelle arbejde. NyS tillader ikke at læsere bruger artikler eller dele af dem i egne artikler uden at citere, eller at læsere på anden vis anvender dem til kommercielle formål.
